Unethical Brand Regret: Do You Actually Love the Brands You Choose Every Day?
- Amy Pedid

- 3 days ago
- 4 min read

Valentine’s Day is loud about love. February 15th is quieter… and honestly more interesting.
Because post-Valentine’s isn’t just chocolate wrappers and receipts. It’s that little emotional hangover where you realize: some choices felt cute in the moment… and then didn’t.
That’s the exact feeling a lot of people have about the brands they buy from every day.
Not because they’re “bad” people. But because modern shopping is built for speed:
quick taps
quick dopamine
quick “add to cart”
and quick forgetting

How to Evaluate Unethical Brands
So here’s the question worth sitting with:
If brands were relationships, would you still choose yours tomorrow—once the sparkle wears off?
This isn’t a callout. It’s a clarity check.
We’re going to do it through something most people overlook:
Brand design is a behavior. It's not just “how it looks.” It’s how it treats people.
Below is a simple, designer-led way to spot ethical vs. unethical brand behavior using The Sage Mages Six-Lens framework: Tone, Logo, Color, Font, Media, UX.

The Post-Valentine’s Check: “Love” vs. “Regret” Signals in Brand Design
1) Tone
Love signals (ethical):
Plain language that respects people’s time and attention
Inclusive descriptions that don’t assume one “default” body, identity, culture, budget, or ability
Clear definitions instead of insider jargon
Transparent claims (what it is, what it isn’t) without moral pressure
Regret signals (unethical):
“Urgency” that feels like emotional manipulation (“Only 3 left!” everywhere)
Vague virtue language with no proof (“We care deeply about people” — but how?)
Shame-centered support language (“You should have read the fine print” energy)
Quick test: Can you understand what they’re offering in 10 seconds without feeling rushed, dumb, or pressured?
2) Logo
Love signals (ethical):
A mark that stays recognizable at small sizes (accessibility + clarity)
Thoughtful symbolism that doesn’t borrow cultural elements carelessly
Consistent usage (less confusion = less cognitive load)
Regret signals (unethical):
Trend-chasing identity swaps every few months with no explanation
Symbolism that feels like “aesthetic appropriation”
A logo so intricate you can’t read it in real life (which often mirrors “we care about appearances more than people”)
Quick test: Does the logo help you identify the brand easily, or does it perform “cool” while failing basic clarity?

3) Color
Love signals (ethical):
Text that’s readable (contrast isn’t optional—it’s respect)
Color used with redundancy (not relying on color alone to communicate meaning)
A palette that supports real-world conditions: glare, aging eyes, color blindness, stress, mobile screens
Regret signals (unethical):
Low contrast because “it’s minimal” (aka hard to read)
Important info hidden in faint gray
“Eco-green” palettes used as a costume while practices don’t match
Quick test: Can you read key info quickly on your phone in bright light?
4) Font
Love signals (ethical):
Comfortable sizing, spacing, and simple hierarchy
Fonts that support readability over “vibes”
Consistent typography rules (predictability reduces fatigue)
Regret signals (unethical):
Ultra-thin type, tiny size, cramped spacing
Decorative fonts used in body copy
Overuse of emojis to carry meaning, create false urgency, or “decorate” important info(This can increase visual noise, reduce scannability, and overwhelm readers—especially neurodivergent audiences.)
Quick test: Does reading their site make you feel calm or like you’re squinting and working?

5) Media
Love signals (ethical):
Real representation (not tokenized)
Images that match the promise (no bait-and-switch)
Captions, alt text, and content that doesn’t exclude people using assistive tech
Regret signals (unethical):
Diversity as decoration, not reality
Heavy filters hiding product truth
Video-first marketing with no captions (a loud tell: “if you can’t access it, oh well”)
Quick test: If you turned the sound off and couldn’t see images, would the message still be understandable?
6) UX
Love signals (ethical):
Transparent pricing, shipping, returns, and terms (easy to find, easy to understand)
Accessible forms, clear error messages, multiple ways to contact support
Calm purchase paths that don’t trap you in popups
Regret signals (unethical):
Dark patterns: forced sign-ups, confusing unsubscribe flows, hidden fees
Pop-up spam that blocks content
Checkout “surprises” (fees revealed late, manipulative add-ons pre-checked)
Quick test: Do you feel guided—or cornered?

The “Brand Relationship” Reflection Prompts
If you want a post-Valentine’s moment of real clarity, try these:
Which brand do you keep returning to—and do you feel good after?
What did the brand make easy for you? What did it make hard?
Did you feel respected in the process… or managed?
If your friend told you this brand’s experience, would you recommend it?
That’s the heart of ethical branding: Do people leave feeling empowered—or exploited?
What To Do When You Spot “Regret Signals”
You don’t have to become a full-time watchdog. Small, sustainable actions count.
Switch one default brand (just one) to a clearer, more transparent alternative
Send one gentle email asking about accessibility, sourcing, or labor practices
Support brands that publish specifics (not just values, but receipts)
Stop rewarding manipulative UX with your attention and wallet/
Ethical markets grow when everyday people make everyday choices.
The Quiet Truth
A brand can say “we care” a thousand times.
But design is where care proves itself.
Because every font choice, contrast choice, checkout choice, and support choice reveals who a brand expects to serve and who they’re willing to leave behind.
So here’s your post-Valentine’s question:
Do you love the brands you choose daily… or are you just used to them?






Comments